Comparison

Oorian vs Vaadin: A Comprehensive Comparison

A detailed comparison of Oorian and Vaadin, exploring component quality, licensing, flexibility, and when to choose each framework.

M. WarbleJanuary 22, 20262 min read
Oorian vs Vaadin: A Comprehensive Comparison

Vaadin is one of the most popular Java web frameworks, and for good reason—it pioneered the concept of building web UIs entirely in Java. But after using Vaadin for years and then building Oorian, we've identified key differences that matter for real-world applications.

The Core Philosophical Difference

Vaadin builds and maintains its own component library. When you need a data grid, you use Vaadin Grid. When you need charts, you use Vaadin Charts. This creates a cohesive ecosystem but with significant trade-offs.

Oorian wraps existing best-of-breed JavaScript libraries. When you need a data grid, you can use AG Grid, Webix, SyncFusion, or others. When you need charts, choose from Chart.js, Highcharts, ECharts, or ApexCharts.

Feature Comparison

Feature Vaadin Oorian
UI Components Proprietary Vaadin components 58 wrapper libraries (AG Grid, SyncFusion, etc.)
Communication WebSocket-first (Push) Choose AJAX, SSE, or WebSocket per page
Licensing Free tier + expensive commercial Free for non-commercial, simple commercial licensing
Lock-in High (proprietary components) Low (standard JavaScript libraries)
Learning Curve Moderate Low (familiar JDK patterns)

Component Quality

Vaadin's components are good, but they're maintained by one company trying to cover everything. Oorian lets you use components from specialists:

  • AG Grid: The industry standard for enterprise data grids
  • Highcharts: Used by 80% of the largest companies in the world
  • FullCalendar: The most popular JavaScript calendar
  • Monaco Editor: The same editor that powers VS Code

Code Comparison

Creating a Data Grid in Vaadin

Grid<Customer> grid = new Grid<>(Customer.class);
grid.setItems(customerService.findAll());
grid.addColumn(Customer::getName).setHeader("Name");
grid.addColumn(Customer::getEmail).setHeader("Email");
grid.addSelectionListener(e -> handleSelection(e));

Creating a Data Grid in Oorian (with AG Grid)

AgGrid grid = new AgGrid();
grid.setRowData(customerService.findAll());
grid.addColumn("name", "Name");
grid.addColumn("email", "Email");
grid.registerListener(this, RowSelectedEvent.class);

The syntax is similar, but with Oorian you get AG Grid's full feature set—the most powerful data grid available.

The Licensing Reality

Vaadin's free tier is limited. For production applications, you'll likely need commercial licensing, which can cost thousands of dollars per developer per year. Many Vaadin features are only available in the commercial version.

Oorian itself is free for non-commercial use with straightforward commercial licensing. The wrapper libraries you choose have their own licensing terms, but you have the flexibility to select libraries that fit your budget.

Conclusion

Both frameworks let you build web applications in Java. The choice depends on whether you value a unified ecosystem (Vaadin) or flexibility and component quality (Oorian). For complex applications where UI quality matters, Oorian's approach offers significant advantages.

Related Articles

Security

Security by Default: How Oorian Protects Your Applications

January 11, 2026
Announcement

Why We Built Oorian: The Story Behind the Framework

January 7, 2026
Tutorial

Getting Started with Oorian: Your First Java Web Application

December 31, 2025