Comparison

Oorian vs Spring MVC + Thymeleaf

Comparing Oorian's approach with Spring MVC and Thymeleaf.

M. WarbleOctober 15, 20261 min read
Oorian vs Spring MVC + Thymeleaf

Spring MVC with Thymeleaf is a popular combination for Java web development. Here's how it compares to Oorian.

The Key Difference

Spring + Thymeleaf: Server renders HTML templates, client handles interactivity with JavaScript

Oorian: Server renders and updates UI, all logic in Java

Interactivity

Spring/Thymeleaf requires JavaScript for dynamic behavior. Oorian handles all interactions server-side.

Real-Time Features

Spring needs additional setup (WebSocket, STOMP). Oorian has built-in SSE and WebSocket support.

When to Choose Each

Spring + Thymeleaf: Static content sites, REST APIs with separate frontends

Oorian: Interactive applications, real-time features, pure Java preference

Conclusion

Both are valid choices. Oorian excels for interactive, real-time applications where you want to stay in Java.

Related Articles

Security

Security by Default: How Oorian Protects Your Applications

January 11, 2026
Announcement

Why We Built Oorian: The Story Behind the Framework

January 7, 2026
Tutorial

Getting Started with Oorian: Your First Java Web Application

December 31, 2025